The House Agriculture Committee sent a major bipartisan message with a 47-6 advancement of the U.S. crypto market structure bill on Tuesday, marking the first of several expected developments in the advancement of digital assets legislation expected this week.
A second congressional panel, the House Financial Services Committee, was also hashing out some of the final details on Tuesday on the bill to set up digital assets market oversight, and at the same time, the Senate's legislation to regulate stablecoin issuers was rolling toward a final vote.
This year's effort to finally set the U.S. stage for crypto trading, known as the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, was the focus of markups — special hearings in which congressional panels consider amendments and put a final polish on legislation before advancing it to the chamber floor. In this case, two House committees were
considering the Clarity Act
at the same time on Tuesday, and the agriculture panel finished first.
"The Clarity Act provides certainty on digital assets to market participants, fills regulatory gaps at the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and the Securities and Exchange Commission, bolsters American innovation and brings needed customer protections to digital asset related activities and intermediaries," said the agriculture panel's chairman, Glenn "GT" Thompson, as he opened
his committee's hearing
.
The panel's ranking Democrat, Representative Angie Craig, noted that "this is not a perfect bill," but also said the tens of millions of Americans using cryptocurrency "will continue to grow whether Congress acts or not, but if we don't act, it will grow without the consumer protections that retail investors need and deserve, protections like those that govern other corners of the American financial system."
The House bill outlines the jurisdictional borders between the two U.S. markets regulators and establishes a new leading role for the CFTC over the trading of digital commodities, which represents the bulk of crypto activity. Because the two congressional committees each oversees different elements of the crypto market — commodities and securities — each has a piece of the relevant jurisdiction, so the panels' work to amend the legislation will have to be melded.
Congressional staffers said that the products of successful markups from each committee would then be combined into a unified "committee report" to be considered by the wider House.
The legislation has been continually overhauled right up to the markups, with Republicans hoping to keep enough Democrats on board that a bipartisan support can influence how much the Senate embraces the bill if it passes the House. But Democrats in the House Financial Services Committee were still meeting to examine points of the bill they have concern with as recently as late Monday.
Representative David Scott, one of the Democrats who serves on both committees, expressed the discontent of some in his party. "The bill allows crypto firms to bypass proper oversight and ignore investor protections, as I have outlined on multiple occasions here and in the finance committee," he said, arguing that the bill doesn't properly fund the commodities regulator. "The CFTC, though essential, is not designed to oversee retail-facing investment products."
Scott added, "This is a gift to the worst actors in this industry."
Others remain concerned that the legislation doesn't directly block senior government officials — most notably President Donald Trump — from personally benefiting from crypto business interests.
Maxine Waters, the top Democrat on the House Financial Services Committee, raised similar concerns when she introduced an amendment Tuesday to the HUD Transparency Act of 2025 that would direct its inspector-general to investigate a suggestion that the Department of Housing and Urban Development might evaluate crypto or stablecoins for payments.
"Unfortunately, Trump and his administration are trying to force crypto down the throats of people living in HUD-assisted housing," she said. "I for one would want to know if HUD is using Trump's stablecoin, how they choose the stablecoin and what fees are being paid into the president's pocket."
While the House moves forward on the Clarity Act, the Senate is nearing a potential final vote this week on the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins of 2025" (GENIUS) Act, which would erect guardrails for the issuance of U.S. stablecoins, the dollar-based tokens that underpin a wide swath of crypto trading.
Majority Leader John Thune, the Senate's top Republican who has recently joined the effort to push forward the stablecoin legislation,
made a procedural move on Monday
to soon advance to a final vote. Industry insiders are preparing for a vote as soon as Wednesday.
Jaret Seiberg, a policy analyst at TD Cowen, said in a note to clients that Thune's move meant a "limit what amendments can be considered before a final vote on the package," including making it difficult for the backers of unrelated credit-card legislation to use the stablecoin bill as leverage to force consideration of their own effort. That was
one of the final potential roadblocks
to Senate advancement on the bill, which has already drawn strong bipartisan votes as it moved through the process in that chamber of Congress.
The legislation's sponsor, Senator Bill Hagerty, had made it clear that the bill faces a very tight window for adoption this year, considering what else is on the Senate's plate. The GENIUS Act was
on the Senate's floor agenda for Tuesday
, with a 2:30 p.m. amendment deadline.
If the GENIUS Act passes the Senate, it'll head to the House, where a similar stablecoin bill already awaits, having cleared its committee hurdles. At that point, lawmakers will have to decide their strategy on how to proceed, whether to include the stablecoin matter alongside the market structure bill as a single package, whether the House can just take up the Senate's bill as written or whether the House will seek to hash out its own version.
